In the Missouri Study, the Average Birth Weight for Babies Born to Smokers Is 3180
- Research article
- Open Access
- Published:
Smoking during pregnancy and harm reduction in nascency weight: a cross-sectional study
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 18, Article number:67 (2018) Cite this article
Abstract
Background
Dissimilar studies have shown the advantages of forbearance from cigarette smoking during pregnancy to promote full fetal evolution. Given that pregnant women do not e'er abstain from smoking, this study aimed to analyze the outcome of dissimilar intensities of smoking on birth weight of the newborn.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was adopted to explore smoking in a population of pregnant women from a medium-sized city in São Paulo state, Brazil, who gave birth betwixt January and June of 2012. Information were nerveless from maternal and pediatric medical files and, where data were absent, they were nerveless by interview during hospitalization for delivery. For data analysis, the outcome of potential confounding variables on newborn birth weight was estimated using a gamma response model. The effect of the identified confounding variables was also estimated by means of a gamma response regression model.
Results
The prevalence of smoking during pregnancy was 13.four% in the written report population. In full-term infants, nativity weight decreased as the category of cigarette number per twenty-four hour period increased, with a significant weight reduction every bit of the category 6 to 10 cigarettes per day. Compared with infants born to non smoking mothers, hateful nascency weight was 320 k lower in infants whose mothers smoked vi to 10 cigarettes per day and 435 m lower in infants whose mothers smoked 11 to 40 cigarettes per day during pregnancy.
Conclusions
Based on the study results and the principle of harm reduction, if a meaning woman is unable to quit smoking, she should be encouraged to reduce consumption to less than six cigarettes per day.
Peer Review reports
Background
Since the adoption of the Framework Convention on Tobacco by member countries of the World Health Organization in 2003, in that location accept been important global actions to control smoking. Despite this, the smoking "epidemic" has grown in some countries considering of the marketing power of the tobacco industry, population growth in countries with extensive consumption, and the number of highly dependent people who are unable to quit smoking [one].
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has estimated that 19.0% of American adults smoked cigarettes in 2011 [ii]. The Special Survey on Smoking, a supplement to the 2008 Brazilian National Household Sample Survey, reported a smoking prevalence rate of 17.two% for people aged 15 years or older [iii]. In the adult population of 27 Brazilian cities, 14.eight% were smokers, and the frequency was greater for men (18.i%) than for women (12.0%) [4].
Information technology is known that smoking can cause lung and other cancers, eye illness, stroke and many other diseases [ii]. When associated with pregnancy, tobacco consumption can have even more severe effects, potentially compromising not just maternal health, but also fetal wellness and viability [5]. In the United States, about twenty% of women are smokers at the showtime of pregnancy; however, xxx.ii% to 61% give up smoking in the prenatal period [vi]. Women who are able to quit tend to accept been lite smokers [7]. There are no national Brazilian data on the prevalence of smoking during pregnancy, nor are at that place estimates on smoking abeyance during pregnancy; yet, a population-based report carried out in Santa Maria, southern Brazil, reported that 23% of pregnant women were smokers [viii].
Cigarettes are amongst the most often used drugs in pregnancy [nine]. A Brazilian study identified greater risk of smoking during pregnancy in women with a college number of previous pregnancies and who did not undergo prenatal care [viii].
Smoking in pregnancy is also associated with cognitive disabilities in the newborn, slower fetal growth, abortion and premature birth [eight, 9].
The mechanisms through which smoking leads to negative effects during pregnancy accept not been fully understood. Nicotine likely plays an of import role. Nicotine causes reduction in uteroplacental circulation, leading to lower maternal weight gain and in turn, negative fetal outcomes, such as small-scale size for gestational historic period, low birth weight, short stature and compromised fetal neurological development. Additionally, cigarettes and their smoke contain more than 4000 potentially toxic substances, and the combination of these toxins in cigarette smoke may be the principal factor responsible for wellness damage [10].
Other important negative effects of smoking are seen in pregnancy and the postpartum menses. During pregnancy, smoking compromises local and systemic immune responses, which in turn may be associated with agin pregnancy outcomes [xi]. Postpartum, cigarettes can cause early abeyance of breastfeeding and consequences for child health and development [12].
Although at that place are countless studies in the literature confirming the relationship between smoking and depression birth weight, they have non considered the dose–response result of smoking on low nativity weight [5, eight, 13]. In view of the loftier prevalence of smoking during pregnancy in Brazil, the high likelihood of adverse perinatal consequences and the difficulty of quitting, this study aimed to clarify the consequence of different intensities of smoking on nativity weight of the newborn.
Methods
This cantankerous-exclusive study evaluated smoking in pregnant women from 13 small towns belonging to the "Colegiado Pólo Cuesta", a health network in Botucatu, a medium-sized urban center (140,000 inhabitants) in southeastern São Paulo, Brazil.
In Botucatu, the Public Health Service operates xviii primary care units that provide basic health care and other health services. Childbirth care is provided by specialty obstetrics and neonatology services at a academy referral hospital, which has forty beds for pregnant/puerperal women, 24 beds for newborns, 30 beds in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for adults and 15 beds for neonates.
In addition to public health services, individual wellness insurance and services are also available in Botucatu. There is i private maternity hospital with 16 beds for significant/puerperal women, 6 beds for newborns and an additional x beds in the ICU for both adults and neonates.
Systematic sampling was used in this report: all pregnant women admitted to give birth at either of the ii maternity hospitals during the study period from January 1 to June 30, 2012, were considered eligible for the report. Only women pregnant with a single fetus were included in the report. A full of 1404 pregnant/puerperal women met those conditions. Seven women refused to participate and 84 were discharged before data drove was possible; thus, the concluding sample consisted of 1313 pregnant/puerperal women, representing 93.5% of the eligible report population.
All subjects gave informed written consent prior to their participation in the study, in accord with established principles of enquiry ethics. The study was canonical by the Enquiry Ideals Commission of Botucatu Medical School (approval number 004/2013).
The variable under investigation was smoking during pregnancy (classified as: no; aye, from 1 to five cigarettes per day; yes, from vi to x cigarettes per twenty-four hours and yep, from 11 to 40 cigarettes per 24-hour interval. With this option, the written report aimed to analyze the effect of dissimilar intensities of smoking on birth weight of the newborn compared to the birth weight of newborns from nonsmoker pregnant women. Smoking during pregnancy information were obtained from medical records (56.3%) and when they were not recorded, they were obtained during interviews (43.7%) with the puerperal women in the hospital where the birth took identify. In the interviews, the question asked was: "Do/Did you smoke during gestation menstruum? If so, how many cigarettes do/did you usually fume per day". For both forms of information drove, women who reported having smoked only as they did non know they were pregnant or for a brusque menstruation of gestation (n = 6) were classified equally non-smoking. Women classified as smokers during gestation were those who reported having maintained this habit throughout pregnancy.
Data were too collected on potentially confounding sociodemographic, medical and behavioral variables. Sociodemographic variables included: historic period (classified as ≤nineteen years, 20–34 years, ≥ 35 years); education (≤ viii years, 9–eleven years, ≥ 12 years); paid employment (yes/no); and presence of a partner (yes/no). Medical variables included information on obstetrical history, namely: first pregnancy, yeah/no; the interval between deliveries, only for multiparous women (≤ 2 years, 3–5 years, ≥ six years); and pregestational overweight or obesity (based on torso mass index and classified according to the Institute of Medicine) [14] (yes/no). The quality of prenatal care was also investigated using the variables: place of intendance (public service facility, private service facility); number of medical visits (observing that seven visits are proposed as minimum by the Brazilian Ministry of Wellness), (< seven visits, vii–14 visits, ≥ 15 visits, subsequently classified into < vii visits, ≥ 7 visits); participation in a prenatal educational group (aye/no); previous advice regarding alarm signs in pregnancy (yep/no); and use of both folic acid (as of the showtime prenatal visit) and iron sulfate (as of the 20th week of gestation)(yes/no). Finally, the presence of any problems during gestation (yep/no) was investigated, including emotional problems; alcoholic drinkable consumption; use of illegal drugs; anemia; high blood pressure, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, or hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, depression platelet count (HELLP) syndrome; diabetes; hyperemesis; hemorrhage, haemorrhage, or threatened ballgame; and infection, such as syphilis, urinary tract infection, toxoplasmosis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or hepatitis.
Infant data were also nerveless to evaluate effects. The issue variable was birth weight (thou). Given the close human relationship between birth weight and gestational historic period, the effects of smoking on term and premature newborns were studied separately [15, 16]; therefore, data were also collected on the nascency status (preterm, full-term) for stratification.
Simply equally for the data on smoking, all these other data were obtained from maternal or infant medical records (including prenatal care cards and records from the delivery room or the nursery) during hospital admission for commitment. Data that were non recorded were obtained by interview with the pregnant/puerperal women, also during hospital admission.
All data were collected past authorized health service professionals, under the supervision of a doctoral pupil in public health who was responsible for quality control. The data were input to a database and checked for consistency earlier statistical analysis.
The information analyses were performed in two phases. Showtime, the effect of each possible misreckoning variable on newborn weight was estimated using a univariate gamma response model (crude analysis); variables with p < 0.twenty were chosen as potential confounders for inclusion in the following multivariate analysis. In the 2nd phase, the smoking event, corrected for the outcome of the identified confounders, was estimated using a gamma response regression model (adjusted analysis). This model was selected for its ability to simultaneously gauge the master consequence and right for the result of potential confounders (post-obit the asymmetric probability distribution of the upshot). Relationships were considered significant if p < 0.05. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Bundle for the Social Sciences SPSS v 20.0.
Results
Most study participants were aged twenty–34 years and had 8 to eleven years of school attendance. Because premature and term newborns, most mothers lived with a partner respectively), employed (49.7% and 56.5%, respectively), were multiparous (57.1% and 62.0%, respectively) and prenatal follow-up had been provided by public services (75.1% and 70.iv%, respectively). Among the women who had preterm delivery (north = 189), 59.three% had attended ≤7 medical visits; among those who delivered at term (n = 1124), 73.2% had attended 8–xiv prenatal visits.
The prevalence of smoking was xviii.0% among mothers of premature infants and 12.half dozen% among mothers of term infants. In both groups, the median of the number of cigarettes smoked per mean solar day ranged from 1 to 40 cigarettes/day. The preterm nascency rate was 14.four%. Median nativity weight was 2410 yard and 3250 g for premature and full-term infants, respectively (Table 1).
The relationship between potential confounders and weight of premature infants is also shown in Table 2. Attendance at ≥seven prenatal medical visits; participation in a prenatal educational group; presence of emotional problems; high blood pressure, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia or HELLP syndrome; hyperemesis; hemorrhage, haemorrhage or threatened abortion; and infection during pregnancy were all identified as possible confounders (p < 0.20).
The relationship betwixt smoking during pregnancy and birth weight of premature infants, adjusted for potential confounders (adjusted analysis), is shown in Tabular array 3. Again, no significant divergence in birth weight was found in relation to smoking.
In contrast, in total-term infants the post-obit potential confounding factors (p < 0.20) were identified: presence of a partner; first pregnancy; interval between deliveries; attendance at ≥7 prenatal visits; emotional problems during pregnancy; age at delivery; illegal drug use; anemia; high blood pressure, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia or HELLP syndrome; hyperemesis; and infection during pregnancy (Table four).
The independent effect of smoking intensity on birth weight was estimated correcting for the potential confounding variables in the adjusted regression model (Table 5). Newborn weight decreased as the category of number of cigarettes per day increased, with a significant reduction at the vi to 10 cigarettes: when mothers smoked 6 to 10 cigarettes per day, infant weight was 320.41 g (CI 95% = − 535.51 to − 105,32) lower than that of infants built-in to nonsmoker mothers; when mothers smoked ten to 40 cigarettes per day, infant weight was 435.01 k (CI 95% = − 733.xvi to − 136,87) lower than that of infants born to nonsmoker mothers. When the female parent smoked during pregnancy up to v cigarettes per day there was no result on birth weight (p = 0.715).
Discussion
This report evaluated the prevalence of smoking and the relationship between nascence weight and smoking intensity in a population of women who gave birth in a medium-sized metropolis in southeastern Brazil. The bear upon of tabagism was evaluated using a cathegorized pattern instead of a continuous variable, considering of the irregular distribution of the variable and loftier proportion of zeros (nonsmoker mothers). That procedure was performed and then that a dilution of the smoking issue could exist avoided (hateful effect), and the impact of different loads of maternal smoking could exist detected: 1 to v cigarretes per day or light smokers, 6 to x or medium smokers and 11 to 40 or heavier smokers.
Assay of the premature infant data showed no statistically significant differences between the birth weight of infants born to smoking and nonsmoking pregnant women. In contrast, the analysis of full-term infants revealed a negative, dose–response effect of smoking on newborn weight. Compared with infants born to nonsmoking mothers, hateful nativity weight was 320 grand lower in newborns whose mothers smoked 6–ten cigarettes per day and 435 g lower in newborns whose mothers smoked 11–40 cigarettes per mean solar day during pregnancy. This upshot was observed even subsequently correction for identified potential confounders, such as maternal historic period, presence of a partner, parity, interval between deliveries, number of prenatal medical visits, emotional problems in pregnancy, illegal drug utilise, anemia, high blood pressure level, hyperemesis, gestational historic period and infection during pregnancy. Interestingly, no statistically significant differences were establish in mean birth weight when mothers smoked i–v cigarettes per day.
An important consideration is that the accurateness of the data on smoking and the number of cigarettes smoked per day during pregnancy may limit the validity of the study findings. It is known that the number of cigarettes smoked per day can vary throughout pregnancy [17], and this was non addressed in the cross-sectional design of the nowadays report, which relied on self-reporting at the time of delivery or medical records. Too, women who reported having quit the habit just at the starting time of gestation were considered as nonsmokers, and the passive exposure to tobacco fume (non investigated) was not considered, which could consequence in some underestimation of the smoking upshot on nascency weight. Withal, an important negative upshot was observed.
The information are representative of a unmarried identify in the southeastern region of Brazil. The prevalence of smoking in the pregnant women that was found in our written report (overall prevalence of 13.4%) corroborates the importance of understanding its furnishings. The smoking prevalence among significant women in Botucatu was lower than that in non-pregnant developed women in São Paulo upper-case letter city (16.viii%) and higher to the boilerplate value reported in other Brazilian capitals (12%), the only population data available for comparisons [iv]. Furthermore, smoking effects are mainly a consequence of biological processes, and that fact also may support the generalization of our findings. Still, it is likely that in similar contexts and populations (middle-income countries with proficient availability of prenatal care), tobacco utilise during pregnancy will negatively affect term newborn weight to a similar extension as information technology did in the nowadays report.
Nigh xl% of significant women are estimated to quit smoking spontaneously, primarily out of concerns for fetal health but also, out of business organisation for their own. Others may be encouraged to quit smoking, through concerted counseling about the risks of smoking to fetus and mother that begins at the initiation of prenatal care [xviii]. On the whole, pregnant women are receptive to educational measures and wellness promotion [17] and are more likely to consider smoking cessation in the context of the frequent contact with health professionals during prenatal care [nine]. Accordingly, the prenatal protocol of the Brazilian Health Ministry [16] instructs that smoking significant women be identified in prenatal medical visits, advised to quit and offered back up to achieve this goal. Every bit such, the findings of the study population are worrying. It is likely that not all meaning women were appropriately counseled during their medical visits. The high prevalence of smoking in the report population shows that actions to address prevention of tobacco utilize in full general and, specially, during prenatal intendance, have been inadequate in the written report region.
Despite the demand for smoking cessation, information technology may be more challenging to achieve information technology during pregnancy, especially considering that a powerful psychoactive drug, nicotine, causes chemical addiction to smoking [19]. Nicotine replacement therapy has been effective in helping the addicted population to quit smoking [twenty] and thus, reduces harm from smoking; however, its utilize during pregnancy is controversial [21]. Questions remain about long-term effects and the rubber of nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy and the postpartum period [13, 21, 22].
From the perspective of practical advice for pregnant women unable to quit smoking, the report findings support the recommendation of less than 6 cigarettes a day to minimize the negative effects of smoking on newborn weight; withal, this must be validated with further studies evaluating the effects of reduced tobacco utilise on birth weight and on other outcomes, such as prematurity, stillbirth and sudden infant decease syndrome.
Conclusions
The study showed that smoking during pregnancy is associated with lower birth weight in full-term infants. Smoking intensity is also important. The study institute a dose–response that was meaning every bit of the 6 to ten cigarette-per-24-hour interval category.
The loftier reported prevalence of smoking among women during pregnancy shows that actions to promote and back up smoking cessation during pregnancy are definitely necessary in the study region. Smoke-free policies, both at a national level and globally, must remain strict, specially when related to recommendations of complete smoking cessation during pregnancy. If, all the same, the goal of total abstinence proves impossible, at that place is even so an opportunity to minimize the negative effects of smoking during pregnancy on birth weight by reducing equally much as possible the number of cigarettes smoked per day.
Abbreviations
- HELLP:
-
Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count
- HIV:
-
Human immunodeficiency virus
- ICU:
-
Intensive Care Unit
- SPSS:
-
Statistical packet for the social sciences
References
-
World Health Arrangement. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2011. Warning about the dangers of tobacco. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. Bachelor from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789240687813_eng.pdf. [cited 2015 Mar 20].
-
Centers for Disease Command and Prevention (CDC). Current cigarette smoking among adults – United States, 2011. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(44):889–94.
-
Instituto Nacional practise Câncer. Organização Pan-Americana de Saúde: Pesquisa especial de tabagismo. PETab. Relatório Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional do Câncer; 2011. Available from: bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/pesquisa_especial_tabagismo_petab.pdf
-
Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Vigitel Brasil 2011: Vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2012.
-
Murin Southward, Rafii R, Bilello G. Smoking and smoking cessation in pregnancy. Clin Breast Med. 2011;32:75–91.
-
Tong VT, Jones JR, Dietz PM, D'Angelo D, Bombard JM. Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy - pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS) United States, 31 sites, 2000-2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009;58:1–29.
-
Stotts AL, Groff JY, Velasquez MM, Benjamin-Garner R, Green C, Carbonari JP, et al. Ultrasound feedback and motivational interviewing targeting smoking cessation in the 2nd and third trimesters of pregnancy. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;xi:961–8.
-
Galão AO, Soder SA, Gerhardt Yard, Faertes Th, Krüger MS, Pereira DF, et al. Efeitos do fumo materno durante a gestação e complicações perinatais. Rev HCPA. 2009;29:218–24.
-
Motta GCP, Echer IC, Lucena AF. Fatores associados ao tabagismo na gestação. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2010;18:08 telas.
-
Ontario Medical Association (OMA). Rethinking terminate-smoking medications: treatment myths and medical realities. Ontario Med Rev. 2008;75(1):22–34. Available from: http://youcanmakeithappen.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/2008RethinkingStop-SmokingMedications.pdf. [cited 2015 Mar 20].
-
Prins JR, Hylkema MN, JJHM E, Huitema S, Dekkema GJ, Dijkstra FE, et al. Smoking during pregnancy influences the maternal allowed response in mice and humans. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:76.e1–14.
-
Del Ciampo LA, Ricco RG, Ferraz IS, Daneluzzi JC, Martinelli Junior CE. Prevalence of smoking and alcohol consumption among mothers of infants under six months of historic period. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2009;27:361–five.
-
Jaddoe VW, Troe EJ, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, Steegers EA, et al. Active and passive maternal smoking during pregnancy and the risks of low birthweight and preterm birth: the generation R study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008;22:162–71.
-
Constitute of Medicine. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Washington: Institute of Medicine; 2009. Available from: http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2009/Weight-Proceeds-During-Pregnancy-Reexamining-the-Guidelines/Written report%20Brief%twenty-%20Weight%20Gain%20During%20Pregnancy.pdf. [cited 2016 Mar 20].
-
Barros FC, Victora CG, Matijasevich A, Santos IS, Horta BL, Silveira MF, et al. Preterm births, low nativity weight, and intrauterine growth restriction in three nascence cohorts in southern Brasil: 1982, 1993 and 2004. Cad Saúde Pública. 2008;24(Suppl 3):S390–eight.
-
Earth Health Organization. Guidelines on optimal feeding of low birth-weight infants in low- and centre-income countries. Geneva: World Wellness Organization; 2011. Available from: http://world wide web.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/9789241548366.pdf?ua=1. [cited 2015 Mar 20].
-
da Saúde M. Secretaria de Atenção a Saúde. Cadernos de Atenção Básica: Atenção ao Pré-natal de Baixo Risco. Ministério da Saúde: Brasília (DF); 2012.
-
Reichert J, Araújo AJ, Gonçalves CMC, Godoy I, Chatkin JM, Sales MPU, et al. Diretrizes para cessação practise tabagismo. J Bras Pneumol. 2008;34:845–80.
-
Grief SN. Nicotine dependence: health consequences, smoking cessation therapies, and pharmacotherapy. Prim Care Clin Office Pract. 2011;38:23–39.
-
Beard Eastward, Aveyard P, Brown J, West R. Assessing the association between the utilize of NRT for smoking reduction and attempts to quit smoking using propensity score matching. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;126:354–61.
-
Brose LS, McEwen A, West R. Association between nicotine replacement therapy apply in pregnancy and smoking cessation. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;128:15–9.
-
Bruin JE, Gerstein HC, Holloway Ac. Long-term consequences of fetal and neonatal nicotine exposure: a critical review. Toxicol Sci. 2010;116:364–74.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the São Paulo Research Foundation for funding this enquiry.
Availability of data and materials
The authors are happy to share anonymized data related to this newspaper upon receiving a specific asking, forth with the purpose of that request. Interested parties may contact nana_carvalheira@hotmail.com.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
All authors take made substantial contributions to the study, and all endorsed the data and conclusions. MCK contributed to conception and design of the study, data acquisition, and analysis and interpretation of information. APPC contributed to conception and design of the study, data acquisition, and analysis and interpretation of data; participated in writing the draft manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content, and gave concluding approval of the version to be published. APF participated in writing the draft manuscript and revised it critically for of import intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published. MBM participated in writing the typhoon manuscript and revised information technology critically for of import intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to exist published. MABLC participated in writing the draft manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content, and gave terminal approval of the version to be published. CMGLP participated in writing the draft manuscript and revised information technology critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent for publication
NA
Competing interests
The authors declare that they take no competing interests.
Publisher's Notation
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This commodity is distributed under the terms of the Artistic Commons Attribution iv.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted utilise, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you requite appropriate credit to the original author(due south) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and point if changes were fabricated. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/cypher/one.0/) applies to the data fabricated available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Reprints and Permissions
Near this article
Cite this article
Kataoka, 1000.C., Carvalheira, A.P.P., Ferrari, A.P. et al. Smoking during pregnancy and impairment reduction in nascency weight: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth xviii, 67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1694-four
-
Received:
-
Accepted:
-
Published:
-
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1694-4
Keywords
- Pregnancy
- Smoking
- Tobacco use cessation
- Birth weight
Source: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-018-1694-4
Post a Comment for "In the Missouri Study, the Average Birth Weight for Babies Born to Smokers Is 3180"